(305) 374-8303Serving Florida Statewide
EN
Contact us
Who We Serve · Canada

U.S. Trademark Protection for Canadian Brands

For most Canadian brands, the U.S. is the first export market and the largest. A CIPO registration gives no rights south of the border, and the USPTO requires Canadian owners to use a U.S.-licensed attorney. We file for Canadian companies directly or through the Madrid Protocol, and work alongside their Canadian trademark agents.

USPTO data · Canada

Canadian trademark filings at the USPTO, 2021 to 2026

Canada was the second-largest U.S. trading partner in goods and services in 2025. Canadian owners file more U.S. trademark applications than owners from any other country in the Americas, led by software, retail, and technology services.

U.S. applications filed by Canadian owners

Applications per filing year from owners with an address in Canada. The 2026 bar covers January through September.

010,00020,00011,09720219,51220228,75920238,73520247,86020255,6552026*
View data table
Filing yearFiledRegistered to dateVia Madrid
202111,0976,080579
20229,5125,052523
20238,7594,583472
20248,7354,140519
20257,8602,389505
2026 (Jan.–Sept.)5,655293384

Most common classes in Canadian filings

Applications naming each class, 2021 to 2025. A filing can name more than one class.

Class 9 · Software, electronics8,893Class 35 · Retail and business services8,595Class 42 · Software and tech services7,832Class 41 · Education, entertainment5,403Class 25 · Clothing, footwear4,430

Canada's leading sectors: software and consumer electronics; retail and apparel; technology services; education and entertainment; natural health products.

Top five Canada-based owners of live U.S. trademark registrations

Current owners with an address in Canada, ranked by the live U.S. registrations they hold. In all, 68,023 live U.S. registrations list an owner in Canada.

Maison Battat Inc.623Spin Master Ltd.367IGT Canada Solutions ULC199Aritzia LP180Astral IP Enterprise Ltd.175
View data table
RankOwnerLive U.S. registrations
1Maison Battat Inc.623
2Spin Master Ltd.367
3IGT Canada Solutions ULC199
4Aritzia LP180
5Astral IP Enterprise Ltd.175

Counts the last listed owner of each live registration, grouping variations of the same company name. Registrations held through U.S. subsidiaries are not included.

45,963U.S. applications from Canada, 2021 to 2025
54%of Canadian applications filed in 2021–2023 have registered, below the 59% rate for all applicants
35%of Canadian applications filed in 2021–2023 were abandoned without registering
6%of 2021–2025 filings came through the Madrid Protocol

How we counted. USPTO trademark records, retrieved October 27, 2026, counting applications by filing date where an owner's address is in Canada. Brands owned through U.S. subsidiaries are counted under the U.S. The "registered" figures include registrations later cancelled.

Inside the numbers

How Canadian applications fare at the USPTO

The USPTO issued 6,952 registrations to Canadian owners in 2025, up 39% from 2021. Today, 68,158 live U.S. registrations and 15,999 pending applications name an owner in Canada.

68,158live U.S. registrations naming an owner in Canada
15,999U.S. applications from Canada now pending
62%of 2021–2025 applications filed on an intent-to-use basis
37%relied on the Canadian filing under Section 44(d) or 44(e)

Applications filed and registrations issued

Applications by filing year, and registrations by the year they issued. A registration usually issues 12 to 18 months after filing.

Applications filedRegistrations issued
05,00010,00015,00020,00020212022202320242025
View data table
YearApplications filedRegistrations issued
202111,0975,019
20229,5124,869
20238,7595,204
20248,7355,700
20257,8606,952

How Canadian owners file: the filing basis

Share of 2021–2025 applications claiming each basis. An application can claim more than one.

Intent to use · § 1(b)62%Use in U.S. commerce · § 1(a)27%Home registration · § 44(e)3%Priority claim · § 44(d)33%Madrid designation · § 66(a)6%

Intent to use lets a brand reserve its U.S. rights before launch. Madrid designations account for 6%.

View data table
BasisApplicationsShare
Intent to use · § 1(b)28,59962%
Use in U.S. commerce · § 1(a)12,26327%
Home registration · § 44(e)1,5323%
Priority claim · § 44(d)15,29433%
Madrid designation · § 66(a)2,5986%

What happened to Canadian applications, by filing year

Status today of applications filed each year. Recent years are still largely pending.

RegisteredAbandonedStill pending
View data table
Filing yearRegisteredAbandonedPending or other
2021 filings6,0804,296721
2022 filings5,0523,3241,136
2023 filings4,5832,7181,458
2024 filings4,1402,3732,222
2025 filings2,3891,2574,214

Most abandonments follow an unanswered USPTO refusal or a missed deadline to file a statement of use. Both are avoidable with a U.S. attorney docketing the file.

What changes in the U.S.

Close neighbours, different systems

U.S. use matters. Since Canada's 2019 reforms, a CIPO registration no longer requires use. The U.S. still does: a use-based application needs sales in U.S. commerce, and every registration must be supported by U.S. use between years 5 and 6.

Goods descriptions differ. CIPO accepts wording the USPTO considers too broad. Descriptions copied into a U.S. filing or a Madrid designation are a leading cause of refusals.

A U.S. attorney is required. Before 2019, registered Canadian agents could act at the USPTO for Canadian clients. That is no longer the case: Canadian owners must now be represented by a U.S.-licensed attorney.

Selling into the U.S.

  • Amazon Brand Registry: Amazon recommends a trademark for each store you sell in, which for Amazon.com means a USPTO filing
  • U.S. Customs recordation stops counterfeit imports at the border
  • File in the name of the Canadian company that owns the brand, not the U.S. distributor
  • Claim priority from your CIPO application within six months
Your route to the U.S.

Madrid designation or direct filing

A Madrid designation through CIPO

Canada joined the Madrid Protocol on June 17, 2019. A Canadian owner can file an international application through CIPO, based on its Canadian application or registration, and designate the United States. For five years the U.S. protection depends on the Canadian filing.

A direct USPTO application

Based on U.S. use, an intent to use, a priority claim to the CIPO filing within six months, or the CIPO registration under Section 44(e). It stands on its own and uses U.S. wording from the start.

Madrid costs

What it costs to enter the U.S. through the Madrid Protocol

A Canadian owner designating the United States pays WIPO in Swiss francs: a basic fee for the international application and the U.S. individual fee for each class. Once the designation reaches the USPTO, it is examined like any U.S. application, with no further USPTO filing fee.

CHF 653WIPO basic fee, international applicationCHF 903 if the mark is in color
CHF 460U.S. individual fee, per classSince April 12, 2026
CHF 300Basic fee to add the U.S. laterSubsequent designation, plus CHF 460 per class
$0CIPO handling feeNone currently charged; confirm at filing
Example: black-and-white mark, U.S. designated only1 class2 classes3 classes
WIPO basic feeCHF 653CHF 653CHF 653
U.S. individual feeCHF 460CHF 920CHF 1,380
WIPO total to enter the U.S.CHF 1,113CHF 1,573CHF 2,033
For comparison: direct USPTO application$350$700$1,050

Government fees only. Each additional country designated in the same application adds its own fee, which is why Madrid is usually most economical when several countries are needed. Later U.S. costs include any response to a USPTO refusal and the Section 71 declaration of use between years 5 and 6 ($325 per class). WIPO fees are fixed in Swiss francs; check the WIPO fee calculator on the filing date.

Lessons learned

Top five filing mistakes Canadian applicants make

These are the errors we see most often in U.S. filings by Canadian brand owners.

1

Filing in the U.S. on Canadian sales alone

A use-based U.S. application requires use in U.S. commerce. Sales only in Canada do not qualify, and false use claims can void the registration.

Use in commerce · § 1(a)
Lesson

File on an intent-to-use basis, or rely on the Canadian filing under Section 44, until U.S. sales begin.

2

Losing a § 44(e) or Madrid registration for nonuse

Registrations based on a CIPO registration or a Madrid designation issue without U.S. use, but are cancelled if U.S. use is not shown between years 5 and 6.

Section 8 · Section 71
Lesson

Plan U.S. sales and keep dated evidence of U.S. use.

3

Copying CIPO goods descriptions

CIPO accepts wording the USPTO considers too broad. On a Madrid designation, this leads to refusals that require a U.S. attorney.

Identification of goods
Lesson

Draft U.S. wording before the international application leaves CIPO.

4

Filing without a U.S.-licensed attorney

Since 2019, Canadian applicants must be represented by a U.S.-licensed attorney. Canadian agents can be added, but the USPTO deals only with the U.S. attorney.

U.S. counsel rule
Lesson

Appoint U.S. counsel at filing and keep your Canadian agent involved.

5

Untranslated French wording

French words in Quebec and bilingual brands must be translated in the U.S. application, and descriptive French terms are refused like their English equivalents.

Foreign equivalents
Lesson

Translate the mark and check its English meaning before filing.

How we support Canadian brand owners

Who does what for your U.S. filing

A U.S.-licensed attorney handles each Canadian matter, supported by paralegals and docketing staff. We work alongside your Canadian trademark agent, who stays involved in the strategy.

§

Attorneys

Your U.S. attorney of record before the USPTO.

  • U.S. clearance searches and a written risk opinion
  • Choosing Madrid or a direct filing, and the filing basis
  • Rewriting CIPO goods descriptions in U.S. form
  • Responses to USPTO refusals and oppositions
  • Enforcement against U.S. infringers and Amazon sellers

Paralegals and docketing

The people who keep your file complete and on time.

  • Collecting CIPO filings and certificates
  • Reviewing evidence of U.S. use and specimens
  • Preparing USPTO filings for attorney review
  • Docketing USPTO, WIPO, and maintenance deadlines
  • U.S. Customs and Amazon Brand Registry paperwork
✉

For Canadian agents

Same time zone, easy to instruct.

  • Eastern Time, the same as Toronto and Montréal
  • Reports in English, with French-language marks reviewed
  • Copies of every USPTO notice with our comments
  • Clear estimates before each filing or response
  • Your client relationship stays with you
Questions

Frequently asked questions

Does my CIPO registration protect my brand in the U.S.?

No. A Canadian registration protects your brand in Canada only. U.S. protection requires a U.S. application or a Madrid designation of the United States.

Can my Canadian trademark agent file at the USPTO?

Not as your representative. Since August 3, 2019, Canadian applicants must be represented by a U.S.-licensed attorney. Your Canadian agent can stay involved, but the USPTO corresponds only with the U.S. attorney.

Can I file in the U.S. before I sell there?

Yes. An intent-to-use application, or one based on your Canadian filing, reserves your U.S. rights before launch. Proof of U.S. use is needed later.

What does it cost to designate the U.S. through Madrid?

The WIPO basic fee of CHF 653 (CHF 903 for a color mark), plus the U.S. individual fee of CHF 460 per class.

How long does a U.S. application take?

Most take 12 to 18 months from filing to registration. Refusals, oppositions, and intent-to-use filings can add time.

What if someone has already registered my brand in the U.S.?

We review whether the registration can be challenged, for example for nonuse or abandonment, and consider cancellation, a coexistence agreement, an assignment, or a U.S.-specific brand.

Can I register a French word as my U.S. trademark?

Yes, but the USPTO translates it. If the English meaning describes the goods, the mark is refused just as the English word would be.

Does use by our U.S. subsidiary or distributor count as our use?

Use by a related company counts for the brand owner if the owner controls the nature and quality of the goods, for example through a written license. Put that control in writing before U.S. sales begin.

Canadian brand owners

Plan your U.S. filing

Tell us your brand, your CIPO filing, and your U.S. launch plans. We will check the U.S. register, recommend Madrid or a direct filing, and give you a written estimate.

  • U.S. clearance searches
  • Madrid designations and direct USPTO filings
  • Responses to USPTO refusals
  • Amazon Brand Registry and U.S. Customs recordation